That is probably the case. I have a hard time with shows that are released after the movie, but somewhere else in the timeline. That is why I'm only now, as an adult (though started years ago) watching all the Star Trek shows and movies in the order they take place, not the order they were released.Pam wrote:I LOVE Agents of SHIELD!! LOVE LOVE LOVE!! But...what do you mean that the Main character shouldn't be there?? It all fits in perfectly with the movie timelines. Maybe you didn't watch enough to understand it.
NOooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!! I LOVE Skye!!!! And I HATE that...wait...spoiler..nevermind...UGH...anywho...I love her character and I think that the actress does a great job with her. I was actually just getting caught up on this show tonight, I'm just 1 episode behind.Vanyl wrote:Agents of SHIELD: They could get rid of Skye and bring the quality up so much from just removing her completely. I think she's neat but the actor portraying her is so stiff Kristen Stewart looks expressive in comparison.
This made me bust out laughing, thanks.Vanyl wrote:I think she's neat but the actor portraying her is so stiff Kristen Stewart looks expressive in comparison.
You realize she is a made-up character for the show...not an actual cannon character?Vanyl wrote:It's got a good feel and I'm a big fan of Pinkett-Smith's portrayal of Fish.
Man, I knew I should have kept watching it...they were not going anywhere with Riddler and Cat-"girl" when I stopped during the holidays.bethnangel wrote:I'm totally enjoying Gotham! It does have a tendency to run slow, but I like getting all of the characters back stories...so excited that the riddler finally branched out...all for love.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest